Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Shadox: One; Citibank: Idiots
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
It's Just a Credit Card, Stupid!
Black Card is not just another piece of plastic. Made with carbon, it is the ultimate buying tool. The Black Card is not for everyone. In fact, it is limited to only 1% of U.S. residents to ensure the highest caliber of personal service is provided to every Card member.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Making Counterproductive Decisions
Monday, January 12, 2009
Credit Card Lost and Found Again...
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Credit Room - Site Review
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Save More by Using Your Credit Card
Friday, October 10, 2008
Credit in Tough Times
Which is why, for the first time since 1999, credit card borrowing is down. Take a look at this CNN article on the subject, but here is the punch line:
That's actually quite impressive. You see? It looks like when it comes right to it, the American people can actually reduce spending. However, under the circumstances I am not clear whether this is folks being fiscally responsible; people simply running out of cash; or credit card companies reducing credit limits. The outcome appears to be positive, but I am not quite sure if the motives are completely healthy or not."The annual rate of consumer borrowing fell 3.7% last month. Credit card borrowing decreased at an annual rate of 0.8% while non-revolving borrowing, including student and auto loans, contracted by 5.4%."
The news is not all good though... (actually, there is very little good economic news these days, but you get my meaning). With two thirds of the economy powered by consumer spending, the fact that people are reducing spending will no doubt reduce growth and will hit the economy that much harder. However, if that's what it take to make us realize that we have to live within our means as a nation, than it's probably about time that we learned the lesson.
So what's the right way to deal with credit cards in a time of crisis? Actually the right method remains the same in good times and in bad. Here are the rules my wife and I live by:
1. Pay it off - every month, no exceptions!
2. Essentials Only - If you know you'll have trouble paying off your card, buy exactly zero non-essential items (and that new computer or sofa are not essential).
3. Track Your Spending - make sure you know where every penny went and why.
4. Get the Right Card - since we pay off our cards every month, it makes sense for us to carry cash-back reward cards - which last year generated about $1,000 in income for us. If you are going to carry ANY balance at all, you should probably find the card with the lowest interest rate available. Forget about rewards.
5. Keep Some Credit Cards - some personal finance bloggers are dead set against credit cards. They maintain that there is no such thing as a good credit card. I disagree. At the very least, a credit card can serve as a last line of emergency access to capital, when more reasonable options are unavailable.
If you are looking for a new credit card, fair credit cards may be a good place to start your search:
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Selecting the Right Credit Card
Thursday, September 04, 2008
Credit Card Rewards: Cash Back or Airline Miles?
1. Cash is King - Cliche, but true. The biggest problem with cards that give you airline miles is that... you get airline miles. This is a very specific benefit that can only be used for one thing: going somewhere. Cash back cards, on the other hand give you an open ended benefit. Last time I checked cash was usable for buying airline tickets (as well as a few other items). Get your cash, buy your ticket or buy diapers, if you are so inclined.
2. I Got Enough Miles - I travel a lot on business, and I have plenty of miles. Over 300,000 on United and over 150,000 on Continental... I never, ever get a chance to use them. Well, actually, I do use my miles for magazine subscriptions and I did use some miles last year to buy that nifty robot of ours. BUT - I got so many miles already, what would I do with more?
My colleague on the other hand, says that he ran the numbers and cash back or airline miles were basically a wash from a total value perspective. He says that the fact he gets miles forces him to take a vacation with his family - one that is free of charge. To quote him: "if we got cash, we would use it to pay for our groceries. Since we get airline miles we feel good about taking a vacation".
I say: to each his own. Personally, I don't need to play mind games with myself and I prefer the flexibility of having more money in my bank account. If we want to take a vacation, we'll take it. We don't really need an extra incentive.
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
What You Buy Can Hurt Your Credit
Anyway, the topic of this post is one specific lending practice that Compucredit allegedly followed. Here is a direct quote from the complaint (page 34):
Emphasis on the last sentence is mine. I want to talk about these practices on two levels. One is the high-level business practices type of analysis. The other is the actual approach that was taken. First, let's talk about this business practice in principle. Generally speaking I think that looking at behavioral data, including purchasing data, to make credit allocation decisions is not a bad idea. If someone is shown to be a bad credit risk by their very purchasing activities, should the lender be forced to keep throwing good money after bad?"CompuCredit has based these credit line reductions on an undisclosed "behavioral" scoring model that penalized consumers for using their cards for certain types of transactions, including transactions touted in their solicitation materials such as cash advances and transactions with the following types of merchants:
Direct marketing merchants Marriage counselors Personal counselors Automobile tire retreading and repair shops Bars and night clubs Pool and billiard establishments Pawn shops Massage parlors.76. In some instances, CompuCredit reduced subscribers’ credit limits to levels below their existing balances and then charged over-limit fees."
Let's look at a couple of the specific examples given: marital counselors - if someone is going through some marital issues, which may or may not result in divorce and financial hardship, I think it is very reasonable to consider them a higher credit risk. The same can probably be said for pawn shops. I am guessing that few people in good financial standing frequent these establishments, and in any case, there is probably a correlation between people who patronize pawn shops and people whose financial situation is less than stellar... So, in principle, if I was running a credit card company I would certainly want to consider factors that would increase my credit risk - including the types of establishments my customers were spending my money at...
Of course, this brings us to such questions as consumer privacy and adequate disclosure. As an avid free market capitalist, I am a strong believer that knowledge is the best form of regulation. For example, once the government forced food manufacturers to disclose the trans fat content of their food, this harmful ingredient quickly disappeared from many products available on the market. If customers are clearly told that their purchasing behavior is a criteria for the level of credit they receive, and they still choose to apply for the credit card, I have no problem with this practice. In principle, at least.
Now let's talk about the specific practice. The ability of credit card companies to lower the credit line after a purchase has already been made, such that the new credit limit is lower than the outstanding balance, is preposterous. The fact that companies are then able to charge their customers an "over the limit" fee is both ludicrous and criminal. This only works in the credit card industry. Can you imagine a situation where a car dealer would be able to increase the selling price of a vehicle three months after you bought it? What if the person selling you a house was able to change his mind about leaving behind his appliances after the deal had already closed and you moved in? How are these examples any different from the credit card company changing your credit line such that you are then forced to immediately re-pay money you don't have?
Congress, the FTC, or whoever is in charge should quickly correct this situation. Credit card companies should be able to make changes that apply to future credit decisions, but never to balances that are already outstanding. Want to change the interest rate? Fine, your decision only applies to future purchases, not to ones that have already been made. Want to reduce the credit line? No problem, so long as it is not below the outstanding balance at any given time.
Saturday, April 05, 2008
Late Payment on AmEx - Happy Resolution
Luckily, because our mistakes happen infrequently, and usually not on the same card, we are usually able to reverse the charges. This time was no different and American Express refunded our money. Nevertheless, we really need to stop making those silly mistakes.
Saturday, March 15, 2008
United Sucks (It's Not What You Think)
My wife and I are enrolled in the credit bureaus' "no-marketing" programs. This means that the number of "pre-approved" credit-card offers that we are getting in the mail has greatly decreased. However, airline & hospitality credit card programs appear to be immune to our requests, and chief among them United Airlines.
Today I did some work around the house and finally got around to doing my shredding. It appears that I have amassed about 6 months worth of materials for shredding, and when I started doing the work, I noticed that there was a particularly large number of credit offers from United Airlines. This got me curious, so I actually did some counting and guess how many credit offers we have received from United in recent months. Let me save you the guessing: 55. This comes out to an average of about two offers per week (!) and these offers are not just for my wife and I. No sir. United seems to think that our five year old son really needs one of their credit cards as well.
I visited the company's website searching in vain for a way to opt-out of these useless and annoying offers. Guess I am just going to have to vent on this blog. So here goes: United, you suck!
If anyone knows of a way to stop this deluge of junk from United, please let me know.
Monday, November 12, 2007
Are Late Fees Frivolous Charges
Anyway, here is an interesting excerpt from that comment, which I have been thinking about for the past few weeks.
Hmmm... good question. In other words, if you are already paying a pretty aggressive interest rate on your credit cards, can late fees be considered a frivolous charge? Here are the two alternatives I came up with:"...The late fee of $39, of course, is the most obvious, and its impact declines as the principal of the loan increases. Nevertheless, one ought to ask exactly what a late fee is charged for. After all, the lender is charging you interest for all of those late days, and interest is usually considered to be the cost of using money. So what is the late fee for? It is not for the employee who looks at the books every day to see who is late - we know that is automated. So what cost, for which the lender is not already being paid, does the late fee cover?"
Alternative #1 - Yes, What Are You Going To Do About It?
You could claim that late fees are frivolous charges. However, if you are a staunch free market supporter, like me, you have to take the position that this makes no difference. These are commercial terms between consenting adults (well, one adult and one company). If you agreed to be charged a frivolous late fee, it's your problem. Deal with it.
Alternative #2 - No, Late Fees Are Legitimate Payments for Breaking the Deal
OK. So you are paying a high interest rate on your card, but as part of the loan terms you agreed to make your payments on time. If you don't pay on time, the lender should be compensated for your violation of the agreement.
In either case, whether you agree with option #1 or with option #2 the result remains the same. While late fees may not be popular or even fair, the credit card market is clearly a competitive one and the laws of supply and demand dictate what consumers pay for the revolving credit they use.
The only problem I have with the notion of late fees is that credit card companies appear to be creating intentionally confusing and misleading contracts that seem designed to entrap consumers into needlessly paying late fees and other charges. A clear example of this is our little Citibank adventure. If you do not mean to entrap your customers, why else would you base the deadline for payments on a different time zone from the customer's own?
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Citibank Late Fee Update
Today my no nonsense fighter of a wife called Citibank and gave them a piece of her mind. Bottom line, charges reversed. Citigroup CEO should be arriving tomorrow at 5 PM to apologize in person and offer us his first born (no thanks, Chuck, we have three of our own).
Never acquiesce to unfair business practices.
Sunday, October 21, 2007
While We are Holding You Hostage - Update
A consumer hearing this message is bound to think that there will be some additional action he may need to take following the drivel, or perhaps he will receive some confirmation message saying that the card was activated. The hapless consumer listens to the meaningless crap and is essentially held hostage for the length of this commercial.
Well, I got a new American Express card in the mail (the old one was a temporary card), and this time when I called to activate I refused to be held hostage. As soon as the mindless marketing pitch started I hung up.
Guess what? Card still works. "While we are activating your card", means nothing. Your card is activated as soon as you key in your account number. You can safely and happily hang up the phone.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
Yet Another Fight with Citibank
Citibank "upgraded" our card. Previously we had a Citibank Dividend Card and they "upgraded" us, without our request or action, to a Dividend World card. The new card has absolutely no advantages over the old one, as far as I can tell. When the "upgrade" was performed we got a new card in the mail, with a new card number.
What Citibank didn't do, is move our statement e-mail alert to the new card. So, here is a summary: Citibank decided we needed a new card, moved us without asking us to this new card, did not move our e-mail statement alert to the new card, and when we consequently missed our payment (because we did not get alerted to the new statement) charged us $86 in fees and penalties. Is that incentive enough for them to "upgrade" people's accounts?
Here is what we will do. We are going to call Citibank and get them to revoke that idiotic fee. If they refuse to do so, we will close not only the account in question but also the other account we have with them.
I will keep you posted on our discussions with the bastards. Can you tell that I have had enough of credit card company antics?
Friday, August 31, 2007
The Most Expensive Loan in History
Apparently, she paid our full balance off as we do every month. However, she paid the bill on the last day of the cycle at a few minutes after 9 PM PDT. Apparently, the billing cycle is calculated according to Eastern Time not to according to our local time zone. The good folks at Citibank, and by good I mean predatory, charged us a total of $82 in late fees and finance charges for supposedly paying our bill 7 minutes late. I think that if you were to calculate the APR on this supposed "7 minute loan" you would find that Citibank tried to charge us the equivalent of 4 million percent per year in interest. My wife, being the take-no-crap fighter that she is, called them up and gave them a good piece of her mind, at which point they relented and reversed this travesty.
Seriously, if you feel that the credit card companies are out to get you, it's probably because they are. Seems we are not alone in our battle against the evil credit card companies. Here is another post on the subject that I came across a few days ago. Jeff of Jethro's World simply escalated the fight until the credit card company (Chase in his case) cried "uncle".
It is good that some of us are fighting back against these predatory practices, but I have to wonder how many people are just paying these fees without a fight? Once again, where is Congress when you actually need them?
Saturday, August 25, 2007
While We Are Holding You Hostage...
As with any other credit card, when the AmEx card arrives via mail it requires activation over the phone. When I called to activate my card I was asked to enter my card number at which point I got something similar to the following message: "Thank you for choosing American Express, while your card is being activated let us tell you about the following great offer..." This was followed by an approximately one minute inane commercial for the company's credit protection services. The thing that really gets my goat is that I know that this is an unnecessary delay - the actual activation of the card takes a second or two, if that. It is a simple database query. The use of the phrase "while your card is being activated" is contrived, and should be replaced by something like "While we are holding you hostage..."
I find this method of delivering a marketing message to be rude and obnoxious. I felt like AmEx was holding me hostage to their marketing message. Would my card be activated if I simply hung up the phone? After I made the call, I remembered that I ran into similar practices with Citibank when I activated my card with them. However, if I remember correctly, when I turned down Citibank's terrible offer (by pressing the appropriate key on my phone), I got something like "Are you sure that you want to decline this offer", followed by another 20 seconds of marketing drivel. At least AmEx did not sink to that low.
I don't care if those companies are advertising free money, whatever it is that they are selling, I am not buying. Companies must be made to understand that if they treat their customers like their property, try to force feed us their marketing messages or simply give us lousy service, we will retaliate against them by using our economic power.
In the course of the simple transaction of transitioning me from an expired card to a new one, AmEx has managed to turn me from a very happy long time customer, into an unhappy customer who writes blog entries about their unsatisfactory level of service. I am not sure that this is the outcome that they were going for.
Saturday, August 18, 2007
American Express Security
Yesterday my wife received her new card in the mail, and since I did not receive mine I called American Express to find out what the reason might be. Well, according to the American Express representative the card was mailed to a different address. Since we have been living in our current house for the past four years, alarm bells in my head went off immediately. Could this be the beginning of a nasty identity theft case?
The first thing I did was to ask the representative what address my new card was sent to. He responded that due to security concerns he was not allowed to disclose that information to me. However, he said he could send me a new card immediately to the correct address. I then proceeded to point out the idiocy of his position - he would not give me the current address the card was sent to because he was, quote "not able to positively identify me", but if I wanted to get a new card all I needed to do was simply give him an address at which to send me one!
I realize that the representative was just following company policy, but what kind of moronic policy is that? If you have concerns about my identity, why would you let me make transactions with the card, or worse, send me a new card to a random address I give you?
I tried a different tactic. I asked him if he could tell me when the address was changed. He said yes, and gave me a date in 2003. The date he gave was the date we moved to our current address. The one at which we have been receiving our statements all these years, and at which my wife just received her new card. I put two and two together, and asked him if he could confirm that the address they had mailed the card to is our old address. He confirmed that this was the case. So it appears that my new card was sent to an address from which I moved 4 years ago.
At this point I had only one question left: if somebody changes the address on his account, does American Express send some sort of notification of the address change transaction to the old address? His answer was: "no".
OK, identity thieves of the world. It appears that American Express is really trying to help you out. By corporate policy it seems that everyone who has the account number can call and change the address on the account, and the company will not even bother to inform the card owner of the change. In addition, if the card owner calls to find out where his information is being sent, the company will not share this information because of... security concerns.
Riddle me this: how can the same company produce a great product like the Blue card, while simultaneously producing the most screwed up and idiotic security policy ever devised. Seriously, American Express, buy a clue.
Friday, June 15, 2007
Fraud Alert from Citibank
I found it a bit strange that an urgent fraud alert would come to us via the U.S. postal service which, while very reliable, is not known as the most expedient method of communication in the 21st century.
Regardless, I picked up the phone and called the number that was given. As you pretty much expect when calling any corporate service center in America these days, I was greeted by an automatic system that asked me to say my account number aloud. The system recognized my spoken words without any trouble and connected me to an agent without any delay. Of course, the first question the agent asked me was to repeat my account number. There's gotta be a law against that.
Generally speaking, the agent was polite and professional, she even waited while I took a business call on my cell phone. I thought that keeping a customer service representative on hold for once was a deliciously ironic turn of events. She took it in good spirits though.
At the end of the day, the "fraud alert" was easily cleared up. It turns out that the automated system spotted what it thought was a double payment to my son's day care center, and wanted to clear that transaction with us. Unfortunately, this was not a double payment, it's called parents paying for summer camp.
All in all, this was a very good experience. Kudos to Citibank for being both vigilant and courteous in their service.